<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AS3 Class to Asset Linkage &#8211; something different?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karoshiethos.com/2008/12/22/as3-class-to-asset-linkage-something-different/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karoshiethos.com/2008/12/22/as3-class-to-asset-linkage-something-different/</link>
	<description>Navigating the treacherous waters of interactive technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed,  4 Aug 2010 08:56:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jon williams</title>
		<link>http://karoshiethos.com/2008/12/22/as3-class-to-asset-linkage-something-different/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>jon williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karoshiethos.com/?p=157#comment-330</guid>
		<description>Not as much. I&#039;ve recently become more comfortable leaving the assets inside a &quot;skin&quot; container (layout in the above example). Effectively, I suppose that means I&#039;m embracing the composition pattern.
It depends on what the goals of your architecture are though. Does it make sense to define an interface if you&#039;ll have more than one skin implementation? &quot;Is-A vs Has-A&quot; should become a mantra that you don&#039;t have a pat answer for. I&#039;m a big fan of having a LOT of different approaches in my toolbox. I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll reach for this one again eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not as much. I&#8217;ve recently become more comfortable leaving the assets inside a &#8220;skin&#8221; container (layout in the above example). Effectively, I suppose that means I&#8217;m embracing the composition pattern.<br />
It depends on what the goals of your architecture are though. Does it make sense to define an interface if you&#8217;ll have more than one skin implementation? &#8220;Is-A vs Has-A&#8221; should become a mantra that you don&#8217;t have a pat answer for. I&#8217;m a big fan of having a LOT of different approaches in my toolbox. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll reach for this one again eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel fljot</title>
		<link>http://karoshiethos.com/2008/12/22/as3-class-to-asset-linkage-something-different/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel fljot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karoshiethos.com/?p=157#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Are you still doing it this way??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you still doing it this way??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
